Senator-judge Alan Peter Cayetano on Tuesday raised concerns over the National Bureau of Investigation’s (NBI) decision to assign its probe into Vice President Sara Duterte’s alleged threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez to its Cybercrime Unit instead of its Anti-Terrorism or Intelligence divisions.
“Whether I was the Presidential Security Command (PSC), the Executive Secretary, NBI, or an ordinary citizen, my first concern is huwag mapatay ang Presidente. But instead of the NBI director taking it upon himself and giving it to the anti-terrorist or to the intelligence (division), sa cyber crime binigay,” Cayetano said during the fifth day of the impeachment trial on July 14, 2026.
“May nagsabi na sa Presidente, ‘papatayin kita.’ How much plainer can that be as an assassination plot?” the senator-judge said.
“I hope if any one of my colleagues here becomes President, magbago y’ung attitude ng NBI. Mas importante pala ang cyber(crime) kaysa sa buhay ng Presidente,” he added.
Cayetano also pressed NBI-BARMM Regional Director Atty. Jeremy Lotoc, who headed the NBI’s Anti-Cybercrime Division and led the investigation into Duterte’s November 23, 2024 threats made during an online briefing, on flagging the vice president’s “admissions against interest,” saying these cannot be taken out of context from the entirety of her statements.
Cayetano had cited three instances in which Duterte had made “admissions against interest”: her November 23, 2024 threats against the President, First Lady, and the then-House Speaker; her financial disbursements at the Department of Education; and her call for calm against a people power revolution.
When asked for his expert opinion, Lotoc, maintained that Duterte made an admission against interest only in her November 26, 2024 video in which she confirmed making the threats days earlier.
Lotoc had earlier defined an admission against interest as, “Sinabi ng isang tao na ikakasira niya, pero instead of denying, ina-admit pa niya.”
Appearing frustrated by Lotoc’s inconsistent answers, Cayetano asked why the NBI believed only the threat and not the vice president’s claim of being targeted for assassination and her call for calm over a revolution.
“If you say it’s an admission against interest and you believe it, you also have to believe na papatayin siya n’ung tatlo… So if you’re going to believe her, na y’ung ibang sinabi ay seditious, eh ngayon sinabi nga niya hindi solusyon ang people power,” Cayetano told Lotoc.
When Lotoc tried again to change his answer as to whether or not certain statements of the Vice President were admissions against interest, Cayetano pointed out that Lotoc had already given his answer.
“Let the record speak for itself,” the senator-judge said